Skip to main content

Blog #4

    In a decision that was announced this week, the Supreme Court ruled that a high school in Pennsylvania violated a sophomore’s right to free speech when they suspended her for using foul language on Snapchat. Back in 2017, Brandi Levy, who was disappointed when she didn’t make the varsity cheerleading squad, vented on Snapchat ““F— school f— softball f— cheer f— everything,” the 14-year-old, frustrated at the prospect of another year on the junior-varsity team, wrote on her cellphone, posting a photo of herself and a friend extending middle fingers.” (Bravin, Supreme Court Rules for High-School Cheerleader Brandi Levy in Free-Speech Case Over Snapchat Post, 2021)


    For the 8-1 decision, Justice Breyer wrote the majority opinion and in it he stressed that schools cannot censor the speech of students on or off campus as long as what they are saying is not “substantially disruptive.” (Sherman, 2021) This means that schools can still punish students for cyber-bullying or for making threats online – those would be “substantially disruptive” and could maybe stop something like a school shooting. In a concurring opinion, Justice Alito wrote “If today’s decision teaches any lesson, it must be that the regulation of many types of off-premises student speech raises serious First Amendment concerns, and school officials should proceed cautiously before venturing into this territory.” (Sherman, 2021)


    This decision is important because even though the language she used was offensive and inappropriate the first amendment still protects her due to freedom of speech. I completely agree with the Supreme Court's decision to rule in favor of Brandy levy because students shouldn’t be threatened with suspension for voicing their opinions even if it is vulgar. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog #6

  PROPAGANDA      Propaganda and advertising may seem very similar. Advertising is something we encounter every day: Think about all the commercials we see on television, the ads we scroll through on social media, or the pop-ups on websites we visit. While some ads may exaggerate the benefits of, or fail to disclose the negative traits of the products they promote, the Federal Trade Commission is the government agency responsible for making sure that the message delivered by advertisers is generally true. Propaganda, on the other hand, is information that is deliberately biased and is used to try to influence the way people view an idea or a belief. Britannica defines propaganda as “dissemination of information – facts, arguments, rumours, half-truths, or lies – to influence public opinion.” (Britannica, 2019)      It only makes sense then that war seems to cause a lot of propaganda. In Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler created the Ministry of Enlightenment a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Supreme Court

    My most important take away  after watching these videos  is that the Supreme court remains the most powerful governing body today. The decisions of the Supreme Court tell the President, Congress, and the states what they may or may not do: The decisions of these nine justices become the law of the land. Something I learned from these videos is The Supreme Court receives about 100 cases a week and 7,000 cases a year but they only agree to hear about 100 cases a year.       One thing that I learned surprised me:   After hearing a case, all nine judges sit in a room and share their opinions, but one justice writes the opinion of the majority. This takes more time than anything else and revisions may go on for months.  All opinions and decisions are announced at the end of the term in Late June. I knew the Supreme Court was important but these videos really educated me on how the rulings of the Supreme Court can impa...
Post a Comment
Read more